Cheating Detection in Online Exams Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning

Abstract

This study aims to identify the best deep learning and machine learning models to identify the unethical behavior patterns of learners using distance education exam data of an educational institution. One hundred twenty-nine online exam data were analyzed by the researcher with three different scenarios to reveal the best model performance in regression and classification. For regression and classification, deep neural network (DNN) from deep learning algorithms and support vector machine (SVM), decision trees (DTs), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms from machine learning algorithms were used. In the regression analysis conducted within the scope of Scenario-1, the model we proposed to detect “cheating” behavior, which is one of the unethical learner behaviors, was found to be a 5-layer DNN model with a test performance success of 80.9%. In the binary classification analysis for Scenario-2, students who “copied” from unethical behaviors were obtained with an accuracy rate of 96.9% by the model established by the 10-layer DNN algorithm we proposed. In the triple classification analysis for Scenario-3 defined in the study, the XGBoost model was found to have the highest accuracy rate of 97.7% for students who “cheated” due to unethical behaviors and the highest performance in all other metric values. In addition, SHAP and LIME methods, which are explanatory methods for the XGBoost model, which is one of the best-performing models, were applied, and the attributes and percentages affecting the model were shared. As a result of this study, it has been shown that the application of the most appropriate layer functions and parameter selection that will increase performance can be effective in estimating complex problems and target values that cannot be solved using classical mathematical models. The proposed models can provide educational institutions with a roadmap and insight in evaluating online examination practices and ensuring academic integrity. Future researchers may need more data sets and different analyses for better performance of the established models.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.