A Comparative Study of Invasive and Micro-Invasive Analytical Methods for the Detection and Identification of Historically Applied Pesticides to Archival Records

Margaret-Ashley Veall · Maeve M. Moriarty · Jennifer Poulin · Marc Vermeulen · Juergen Vervoorst · Lora V. Angelova

2 citations0/0 files storedStudies in Conservation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Conservation Techniques and Studies Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Abstract

The National Archives UK has previously carried out invasive sampling and analysis on records in its collections which were found to contain various organochlorine pesticide (OCP) residues on all tested items regardless of format or period of creation. This study presented a rare opportunity to carry out comparative research of invasive and swab sampling methods on original, historic materials for the detection and identification of hazardous substances. Swabbing was carried out on the same records that had been invasively sampled to determine the sensitivity and applicability of this method relative to invasive sampling as well as the likelihood of pesticide transfer during handling of the records. Analysis by gas chromatography -mass spectrometry (GC-MS) demonstrated that the presence of a number of pesticides could effectively be identified using a dry swabbing method, including pentachlorophenol, ortho-phenylphenol, and the breakdown products of DDT and methoxychlor. The pesticides identified in invasive and swab testing from the same book were sometimes different, highlighting that the method of sampling will affect the results. Our results from this case study provide a snapshot, comparing the concentrations of hazardous organic pesticides detected in the invasive tests versus those found in swabs, and compare these quantities to human health-based screening concentrations. We argue that a dry swabbing programme is a good option in archival settings for screening for a comprehensive suite of pesticides, complementing existing occupational health approaches that take into account a whole collection, and can provide information to facilitate access and handling of historical records.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Occurrence of organic biocides in the air and dust at the Natural History Museum of Rouen, France 2019Poisonous books: analyses of four sixteenth and seventeenth century book bindings covered with arsenic rich green paint 1986An Evaluation of Ortho-Phenyl Phenol as a Fungicidal Fumigant for Archives and Libraries 2016Arsenic and mercury in bird feathers: Identification and quantification of inorganic pesticide residues in natural history collections using multiple analytical and imaging techniques 2019Monitoring of arsenic, mercury and organic pesticides in particulate matter, ambient air and settled dust in natural history collections taking the example of the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin 1987Insecticide Analysis by Gas Chromatography in the Stores of the Danish National Museum's Ethnographic Collection 1978The Use of Fumigants in Archival Repositories 2019Application of a non-invasive, non-destructive technique to quantify naphthalene emission rates from museum objects

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.