SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of Spin in Clinical Trials of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
16 references·0 citing·49 second hopsampled
Evaluation of Spin in Clinical Trials of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review (2025)Evaluation of Spin in Clinical Trials of …Evaluation of spin in reviews of biodegradable balloon spacers for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (2023)Evaluation of spin in reviews…Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract (2022)Reporting Bias in Systematic …Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review (2021)Spin occurs in bariatric surg…Over 30% of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses Focused on Rotator Cuff Tear Treatments Contained Spin in the Abstract (2021)Over 30% of Systematic Review…Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (2021)Evaluation of spin in the abs…Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Covering Treatments for Achilles Tendon Ruptures (2021)Evaluation of Spin in the Abs…Analysis of spin in vascular surgery randomized controlled trials with nonsignificant outcomes (2021)Analysis of spin in vascular …Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing “Negative” Results and Open Access (2020)Researcher's Perceptions on P…Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2020)Extent and prevalence of spin…Analyzing Spin in Abstracts of Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Insignificant Primary Endpoints (2020)Analyzing Spin in Abstracts o…Is positive publication bias really a bias, or an intentionally created discrimination toward negative results? (2019)Is positive publication bias …An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials (2019)An Evaluation of Spin in Lowe…A systematic review finds that spin or interpretation bias is abundant in evaluations of ovarian cancer biomarkers (2019)A systematic review finds tha…Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misrepresentation and distort…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis (2020)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract’s conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect (2020)Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial (2022)SPIN-PM: a consensus framework to evaluate the presence of spin in studies on prediction models (2024)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Exploring the scientific impact of negative results (2023)The role of active and passive music engagement in cognitive development: A systematic review (2024)Time to publication for results of clinical trials (2024)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 (2021)Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis (2022)Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Dental Caries with Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes: A Methodological Study (2023)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Replication studies: Bad copy (2012)Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals (2022)Dissimulate or disseminate? A survey on the fate of negative results (2022)Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results (2025)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction (2022)Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Orthopaedics: A Cross-sectional Analysis (2023)Spin in the Abstracts of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
  • 2020Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing “Negative” Results and Open Access45 cited
  • 2019Is positive publication bias really a bias, or an intentionally created discrimination toward negative results?43 cited
  • 2019An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials37 cited
  • 2020Analyzing Spin in Abstracts of Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Insignificant Primary Endpoints37 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures34 cited
  • 2019A systematic review finds that spin or interpretation bias is abundant in evaluations of ovarian cancer biomarkers33 cited
  • 2020Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry30 cited
  • 2021Over 30% of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses Focused on Rotator Cuff Tear Treatments Contained Spin in the Abstract25 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Covering Treatments for Achilles Tendon Ruptures23 cited
  • 2023Evaluation of spin in reviews of biodegradable balloon spacers for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited
  • 2021Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review17 cited
  • 2021Analysis of spin in vascular surgery randomized controlled trials with nonsignificant outcomes15 cited
  • 2022Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract12 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.