SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
16 references·1 citing·43 second hop
Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors? (2025)Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: Mor…Evaluating research quality with Large Language Models: An analysis of ChatGPT’s effectiveness with different settings and inputs (2024)Evaluating research quality w…Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality? (2024)Can ChatGPT evaluate research…Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review (2023)Artificial intelligence to su…National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance (2020)National Lists of Scholarly P…Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research (2019)Co-existing Notions of Resear…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland (2017)Does an expert-based evaluati…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles (2015)Geometric journal impact fact…The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure (2014)The Citation: From Culture to…Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation (2012)Citation time window choice f…Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations (2010)Scopus's source normalized im…Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor”Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Large language models and responsible research evaluation: an extension of the Leiden Manifesto (2026)Large language models and res…The scientific impact of nations (2004)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014)25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda (2020)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Inteligencia artificial, investigación y revisión por pares: escenarios futuros y estrategias de acción (2023)Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers (2025)When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,471 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,449 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review824 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management634 cited
  • 2012Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation451 cited
  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations379 cited
  • 1998The Journal “Impact Factor”206 cited
  • 2019Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research170 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review160 cited
  • 2010Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations159 cited
  • 2014The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure78 cited
  • 2015Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles71 cited
  • 2024Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?68 cited
  • 2020National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

62 cited
  • 2017Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland57 cited
  • 2024Evaluating research quality with Large Language Models: An analysis of ChatGPT’s effectiveness with different settings and inputs47 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2026Large language models and responsible research evaluation: an extension of the Leiden Manifesto5 cited