SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Foot osteoarthritis research: A bibliometric analysis
10 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Foot osteoarthritis research: A bibliometric analysis (2025)Foot osteoarthritis research: A bibliomet…How far has diabetes‐related foot disease research progressed in Australia? A bibliometric review (1970–2023) (2024)How far has diabetes‐related …Global Research on Osteoarthritis During 1994–2023: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications and Citations (2024)Global Research on Osteoarthr…Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)Preliminary guideline for rep…A bibliometric analysis of published research employing musculoskeletal imaging modalities to evaluate foot osteoarthritis (2022)A bibliometric analysis of pu…A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)A tale of two databases: the …bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)bibliometrix : An R-tool for …Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals (2015)Worldwide productivity in the…Osteoarthritis research priorities: a report from a EULAR ad hoc expert committee (2014)Osteoarthritis research prior…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Why is research from developing countries underrepresented in international health literature, and what can be done about it? (2004)The 10/90 divide in mental health research: Trends over a 10-year period (2005)Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis (2013)Światowa produktywność badań w dziedzinie endokrynologii i metabolizmu — analiza bibliometryczna (2015)Worldwide Research Productivity in the Field of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (2015)Bibliometric and authorship trends over a 30 year publication history in two representative US sports medicine journals (2020)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2013)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal (2024)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Spiritual Care in Palliative Medicine and End of Life: A Bibliometric Network Analysis (2024)Evaluating Bibliometrics Reviews: A Practical Guide for Peer Review and Critical Reading (2025)Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review (2025)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)A scientometric analysis of highly cited papers in Indian spine research (1995–2024): navigating the impact (2025)Mapping Orthopedic Research Trends in Nepal (2000-2024): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Study (2025)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis19,854 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,591 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,471 cited
  • 2020A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers1,837 cited
  • 2023Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements476 cited
  • 2014Osteoarthritis research priorities: a report from a EULAR ad hoc expert committee161 cited
  • 2015Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals59 cited
  • 2024Global Research on Osteoarthritis During 1994–2023: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications and Citations13 cited
  • 2024How far has diabetes‐related foot disease research progressed in Australia? A bibliometric review (1970–2023)10 cited
  • 2022A bibliometric analysis of published research employing musculoskeletal imaging modalities to evaluate foot osteoarthritis7 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work