SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Kanunu’nun Risk Grupları ve İlgililerin Yükümlülükleri Bağlamında İncelenmesi
9 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Kanunu’nun Risk Grupları ve İlgililerin Yükümlülükleri Bağlamında İncelenmesi (2025)Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Kanunu’nun Risk…Truly Risk-based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence How to Implement the EU’s AI Act (2024)Truly Risk-based Regulation o…The Brussels Side-Effect: How the AI Act Can Reduce the Global Reach of EU Policy (2024)The Brussels Side-Effect: How…How the EU AI Act Seeks to Establish an Epistemic Environment of Trust (2024)How the EU AI Act Seeks to Es…Enforcement Design Patterns in EU Law: An Analysis of the AI Act (2024)Enforcement Design Patterns i…Blockchain for Artificial Intelligence (AI): enhancing compliance with the EU AI Act through distributed ledger technology. A cybersecurity perspective (2024)Blockchain for Artificial Int…An interdisciplinary account of the terminological choices by EU policymakers ahead of the final agreement on the AI Act: AI system, general purpose AI system, foundation model, and generative AI (2024)An interdisciplinary account …A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities (2024)A Robust Governance for the A…Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models (2023)Regulating ChatGPT and other …ChatGPT and the AI Act (2023)ChatGPT and the AI ActDemystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach (2021)Ethical Challenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (2024)Generative artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management: a capability-based framework for analysis and implementation (2024)The potential of generative AI for personalized persuasion at scale (2024)Artificial Intelligence Safety and Cybersecurity: a Timeline of AI Failures (2016)How AI can be a force for good (2018)What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion (2021)Trust and Antitrust (1986)Trust and trustworthiness (2002)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (1999)EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (2011)Eu regulatory ecosystem for ethical AI (2025)Navigating Through Human Rights in AI: Exploring the Interplay Between GDPR and Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (2025)From a 'Race to AI' to a 'Race to AI Regulation' - Regulatory Competition for Artificial Intelligence (2019)The Changing Nature of Human-AI Relations: A Scoping Review on Terminology and Evolvement in the Scientific Literature (2025)From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices (2019)Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works (2022)Generative AI in Marketing and Principles for Ethical Design and Deployment (2024)Why the AI Hype is Another Tech Bubble (2024)Governing High-Risk Technologies in a Fragmented World: Geopolitical Tensions, Regulatory Gaps, and Institutional Barriers to Global Cooperation (2025)The Brussels Effect (2019)The European risk-based approaches: Connecting constitutional dots in the digital age (2022)AI Governance in the GCC States: A Comparative Analysis of National AI Strategies (2025)Digital ethics: Global trends and divergent paths (2025)Navigating the complexities of AI and digital governance: the 5W1H framework (2025)Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach (2023)Typology of Risks of Generative Text-to-Image Models (2023)Big AI: Cloud infrastructure dependence and the industrialisation of artificial intelligence (2024)Governing AI in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s way forward (2024)Building Symbiotic Artificial Intelligence: Reviewing the AI Act for a Human-Centred, Principle-Based Framework (2025)The EU AI Act in a global perspective (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models466 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT and the AI Act146 cited
  • 2024Truly Risk-based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence How to Implement the EU’s AI Act124 cited
  • 2024A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities77 cited
  • 2024The Brussels Side-Effect: How the AI Act Can Reduce the Global Reach of EU Policy61 cited
  • 2024Blockchain for Artificial Intelligence (AI): enhancing compliance with the EU AI Act through distributed ledger technology. A cybersecurity perspective40 cited
  • 2024Enforcement Design Patterns in EU Law: An Analysis of the AI Act27 cited
  • 2024How the EU AI Act Seeks to Establish an Epistemic Environment of Trust25 cited
  • 2024An interdisciplinary account of the terminological choices by EU policymakers ahead of the final agreement on the AI Act: AI system, general purpose AI system, foundation model, and generative AI19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work