SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types
7 references·0 citing·29 second hop
Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types (2025)Distribution of trial registry numbers wi…Unreported links between trial registrations and published articles were identified using document similarity measures in a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (2017)Unreported links between tria…A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)A systematic review of the pr…Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence (2014)Linked publications from a si…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials (2013)Linking ClinicalTrials.gov an…Precision and negative predictive value of links between ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed. (2012)Precision and negative predic…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs (2017)The significance of the trial outcome was associated with publication rate and time to publication (2017)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Systematic reviews that include only published data may overestimate the effectiveness of analgesic medicines for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)The Role of Clearinghouses in Promoting Transparent Research: A Methodological Study of Transparency Practices for Preventive Interventions (2021)A meta-research study of randomized controlled trials found infrequent and delayed availability of protocols (2022)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses (2023)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results (2021)Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study (2022)Aggregator: A machine learning approach to identifying MEDLINE articles that derive from the same underlying clinical trial (2014)A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2013Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials90 cited
  • 2017A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results47 cited
  • 2012Precision and negative predictive value of links between ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed.27 cited
  • 2014Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence24 cited
  • 2017Unreported links between trial registrations and published articles were identified using document similarity measures in a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov22 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work