SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Best Practices for Conducting Systematic Reviews: Perspectives of Experienced Systematic Review Researchers in Educational Sciences
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Best Practices for Conducting Systematic Reviews: Perspectives of Experienced Systematic Review Researchers in Educational Sciences (2025)Best Practices for Conducting Systematic …The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)The ABC of systematic literat…Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educati…Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review (2019)Methodological Guidance Paper…How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)How to Do a Systematic Review…Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Gray literature: An important…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research (2012)The benefits and challenges o…A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research (2011)A Guide to Conducting a Syste…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic Reviews in the Soc…Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Procedures for Performing Sys…Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2 (2001)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)A systematic review of gamification in e-Health (2017)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)Towards Sustainable Energy: A Systematic Review of Renewable Energy Sources, Technologies, and Public Opinions (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review (2024)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews11,672 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2004Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews5,198 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences3,582 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2018How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses2,546 cited
  • 2011A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research1,849 cited
  • 2017Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews1,453 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2020The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners655 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application
599 cited
  • 2019Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review567 cited
  • 2012The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research565 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.