No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Classic Rabbinic literature of the third and fourth centuries, both in its Palestinian and Babylonian exemplars, presents us with the elements of a theology of oral transmission that reflected, justified, and shaped the oral transmission of Rabbinic learning.1 Despite the plethora of data indicating the privileged position of oral transmission, there has been a disinclination to acknowledge this possibility, if only because of the massive amount of material that had to be memorized—2711 folio pages—and the existence of alternative paradigms in Greco-Roman culture. In the following remarks, I shall attempt to marshal the data that point to the overwhelming likelihood that this legal material (about two-thirds of the total) was orally transmitted, and that the analytical and dialectical redactional layer, perhaps 55 % of the Babylonian Talmud (hereafter: the Bavli), was also orally composed. This long period of oral transmission and composition took place against a background of what I shall term “pervasive orality ” in Babylonia, as contrasted with the greater prevalence of written transmission in the Greco-Roman cultural sphere. Study of the Bavli is potentially fruitful for understanding the effects of orality in light of three advances that have been made within the field of recent Talmudic study, each of which may affect our understanding of the interplay of oral and written texts in Rabbinic Babylonia. One relates to the history of Middle Hebrew, one to the question of oral transmission in Amoraic times (fourth-fifth centuries), and one to the dating of the anonymous, framing, or interpretive comments on the remaining attributed material, including large amounts of interpolated dialectic. The discovery that Middle Hebrew texts can be dated linguistically allows us to trace the evolution of such texts, comparing, for example,
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.