SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ethical guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-assisted tools in scholarly publishing: a thematic analysis
5 references·0 citing·30 second hopsampled
Ethical guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-assisted tools in scholarly publishing: a thematic analysis (2025)Ethical guidelines for the use of generat…Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Research ethics and issues re…Peer Review in the Age of Generative AI (2024)Peer Review in the Age of Gen…Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies (2024)Death of a reviewer or death …Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics (2023)Specific challenges posed by …Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if Ch…I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review (1989)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Stakeholder perspectives on ethical and trustworthy voice AI in health care (2024)The Use of Technology Assisted by Artificial Intelligence Depending on the Companies’ Digital Maturity Level (2024)Symmetric Therapeutic Frameworks and Ethical Dimensions in AI-Based Mental Health Chatbots (2020–2025): A Systematic Review of Design Patterns, Cultural Balance, and Structural Symmetry (2025)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)A guide for structured literature reviews in business research: The state-of-the-art and how to integrate generative artificial intelligence (2024)Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development (2025)Peer review in health sciences (2002)Accountability in algorithmic decision making (2016)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality? (2024)Is AI my co-author? The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific publishing (2024)Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers (2025)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications? (2024)A Cross‐Disciplinary Analysis of AI Policies in Academic Peer Review (2025)Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2023Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy4,557 cited
  • 2023Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics95 cited
  • 2024Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies63 cited
  • 2024Peer Review in the Age of Generative AI47 cited
  • 2024Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review42 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work