SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Questioning the Predator of the Predatory Journals: How Fair Are Global Publishing Standards?
15 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Questioning the Predator of the Predatory Journals: How Fair Are Global Publishing Standards? (2025)Questioning the Predator of the Predatory…The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)The manifold costs of being a…Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations (2023)Are papers published in preda…Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions (2022)Article-processing charges as…RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences (2021)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory …Predatory Open Access Journals are Indexed in Reputable Databases: a Revisiting Issue or an Unsolved Problem (2020)Predatory Open Access Journal…How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)How reliable and useful is Ca…Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (2020)Defining predatory journals a…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Predatory journals: Who publi…How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)How predatory journals leak i…Cabell's Blacklist: A New Way to Tackle Predatory Journals (2018)Cabell's Blacklist: A New Way…Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran (2017)Publishing in Predatory Open …Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior (2021)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation (1991)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2010)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Geography and Economic Development (1998)Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database (2012)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences (2022)Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers (2015)Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)Should I include studies from “predatory” journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers (2021)Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: benefits, challenges and limitations (2023)Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics (2023)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Wilfully submitting to and publishing in predatory journals - a covert form of research misconduct? (2021)Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience (2023)Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers (2004)Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education (2018)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing (2023)Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education (2024)Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary? (2025)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access1,028 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence837 cited
  • 2023The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science541 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?402 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?299 cited
  • 2018What is a predatory journal? A scoping review142 cited
  • 2018How predatory journals leak into PubMed142 cited
  • 2020Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process104 cited
  • 2021RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences82 cited
  • 2020Predatory Open Access Journals are Indexed in Reputable Databases: a Revisiting Issue or an Unsolved Problem67 cited
  • 2020How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis41 cited
  • 2017Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran40 cited
  • 2018Cabell's Blacklist: A New Way to Tackle Predatory Journals39 cited
  • 2022Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions33 cited
  • 2023Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.