SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Short, But How Short? Analysis of Educational Research Titles
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Short, But How Short? Analysis of Educational Research Titles (2025)Short, But How Short? Analysis of Educati…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…The Tyranny of Metrics (2018)The Tyranny of MetricsGoogle Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (2017)Suitability of Google Scholar…Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Factors affecting number of c…A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science (2016)A bibliometric analysis of op…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates (2006)Publish or perish: a systemat…Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Genre analysis : English in a…The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plu…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions (2019)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (1940)An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants (1955)Working Memory (1974)A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures (1977)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Preliminaries to speech analysis (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse (2005)Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions (2006)A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World (2016)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.17,866 cited
  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines14,255 cited
  • 1993Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95.5,142 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,084 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 2016Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature912 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review786 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 2016A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

754 cited
  • 2018The Tyranny of Metrics529 cited
  • 2006Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates524 cited
  • 2017Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature486 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.