SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics of OA Diamond Journal Publishing in Non-English-Speaking Countries
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Characteristics of OA Diamond Journal Publishing in Non-English-Speaking Countries (2025)Characteristics of OA Diamond Journal Pub…Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers (2023)Toward equitable open researc…Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Predatory publishing in Scopu…Overcoming Language Barriers in Academia: Machine Translation Tools and a Vision for a Multilingual Future (2022)Overcoming Language Barriers …Ten tips for overcoming language barriers in science (2021)Ten tips for overcoming langu…Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity (2021)Tapping into non-English-lang…OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings (2021)OA Diamond Journals Study. Pa…A solution for breaking the language barrier (2021)A solution for breaking the l…Scrutinising what Open Access Journals Mean for Global Inequalities (2020)Scrutinising what Open Access…Science Communication in Multiple Languages Is Critical to Its Effectiveness (2020)Science Communication in Mult…Attitudes of North American Academics toward Open Access Scholarly Journals (2020)Attitudes of North American A…Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholar…English as the lingua franca of international publishing (2018)English as the lingua franca …Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Bibliometrics: Global gender …Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of R ussian science (1993–2010) (2012)Changes in publication langua…International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980-2008 (2011)International coauthorship an…International visibility of Chinese scientific journals (2002)International visibility of C…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level (2013)The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy (2015)Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers (2022)Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences (2006)Science of science (2018)Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health (2019)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: how “international” are the international journals? (1998)Using the Literature: Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship (2000)Are international journals of human geography really international? (2001)Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: A structural equation modelling analysis (2004)Non-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations? (2012)Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach (2022)Linguistic Imperialism (1993)The Phonology of English as an International Language (2001)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Exemplification in research articles: Structural, semantic and metadiscursive properties across disciplines (2021)LATIN AMERICAN JOURNALS AND HEGEMONIC LANGUAGES FOR ACADEMIC PUBLISHING IN SCOPUS AND WEB OF SCIENCE (2021)Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English (2021)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)“Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice – Making a difference in industry, policy, and society (2024)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences (2014)Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science (2016)A Systematic Map of Inclusion, Equity and Diversity in Science Communication Research: Do We Practice what We Preach? (2021)Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations (2022)The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration (2018)Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences (2020)The role of non-English-language science in informing national biodiversity assessments (2023)Three pathways to better recognize the expertise of Global South researchers (2023)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Tractatus logico-philosophicus (2021)Growth of non‐English‐language literature on biodiversity conservation (2022)Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (2023)A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing (2002)Ethnologue: languages of the world (2005)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies (2024)Exploring challenges in academic language-related skills of EFL learners in Chinese EMI settings (2024)Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives (2024)Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011–2021 (2022)Open Science Needs No Martyrs, but We Must Recognize the Need for Reform (2022)Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science1,496 cited
  • 2021Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity251 cited
  • 2020Science Communication in Multiple Languages Is Critical to Its Effectiveness171 cited
  • 2022Overcoming Language Barriers in Academia: Machine Translation Tools and a Vision for a Multilingual Future153 cited
  • 2021OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings143 cited
  • 2019Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing128 cited
  • 2011International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980-2008120 cited
  • 2021Ten tips for overcoming language barriers in science104 cited
  • 2018English as the lingua franca of international publishing79 cited
  • 2002International visibility of Chinese scientific journals76 cited
  • 2022Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences70 cited
  • 2012Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of R ussian science (1993–2010)62 cited
  • 2020Scrutinising what Open Access Journals Mean for Global Inequalities56 cited
  • 2021A solution for breaking the language barrier50 cited
  • 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Attitudes of North American Academics toward Open Access Scholarly Journals
41 cited
  • 2023Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers39 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.