SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Accuracy of Large Language Models for Literature Screening in Thoracic Surgery: Diagnostic Study
15 references·3 citing·43 second hop
Accuracy of Large Language Models for Literature Screening in Thoracic Surgery: Diagnostic Study (2025)Accuracy of Large Language Models for Lit…Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing (2024)Three ways ChatGPT helps me i…Performance of a Large Language Model in Screening Citations (2024)Performance of a Large Langua…Enhancing title and abstract screening for systematic reviews with GPT-3.5 turbo (2023)Enhancing title and abstract …Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? (2023)Are ChatGPT and large languag…A real‐world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review (2023)A real‐world evaluation of th…Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)Using artificial intelligence…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing in Mental Health: Systematic Review (2020)Machine Learning and Natural …Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools (2019)Performance and usability of …Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool (2018)Technology-assisted title and…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…How to Write a Systematic Review (2013)How to Write a Systematic Rev…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Efficient Literature Screening (2025)Performance Comparison of Lar…Artificial Intelligence Tools for Automating Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Review (2025)Artificial Intelligence Tools…A comparative study of screening performance between abstrackr and GPT models: Systematic review and contextual analysis (2025)A comparative study of screen…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Effects of Evening Exercise on Sleep in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2018)Mindfulness-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Substance and Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review (2018)Etapas na Condução de uma Revisão Sistemática (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)Distributional Structure (1954)Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Artificial intelligence and suicide prevention: A systematic review (2022)Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review (2024)Machine Learning for Multimodal Mental Health Detection: A Systematic Review of Passive Sensing Approaches (2024)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave (2022)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study (2024)How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes (2020)Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review (2025)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,149 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2013How to Write a Systematic Review605 cited
  • 2020Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing in Mental Health: Systematic Review575 cited
  • 2022Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review222 cited
  • 2020Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews214 cited
  • 2023Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?206 cited
  • 2018Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool148 cited
  • 2019Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools133 cited
  • 2024Performance of a Large Language Model in Screening Citations85 cited
  • 2024Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing53 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2023Enhancing title and abstract screening for systematic reviews with GPT-3.5 turbo39 cited
  • 2023A real‐world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review30 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Artificial Intelligence Tools for Automating Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Review9 cited
    • 2025Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Efficient Literature Screening6 cited
    • 2025A comparative study of screening performance between abstrackr and GPT models: Systematic review and contextual analysis6 cited