No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Drawing on a case study of Brisbane, Australia, this paper explores the parallels between the historical formation of settler-colonial cities and contemporary urban renewal schemes. Focusing on the development of a penal settlement (1825-) and largescale waterfront redevelopment (1988-), this study demonstrates how use of overt, top-down state power and a degree of authoritarianism is necessary to facilitate both forms of urban restructuring. Archival materials are used to track the transformation of the study areas at a street, lot and building scale, as well as the legislative framework and social and cultural context, to 2024. Findings develop an understanding of the legacy of colonial approaches to land management and property delineation, and how they continue to permeate throughout contemporary planning practices, including the ongoing effects of dispossession and historical revisionism. Like colonial land use planning, largescale urban renewal programs assume a blank slate exists for the transformations envisioned by decision makers, which can be at odds with the reality of peoples' connection to the land, community identity, property rights and history. • Explores the parallels between the historical formation of settler-colonial cities and contemporary urban renewal schemes. • Archival materials track transformation at multiple scales and contexts (1825-2024), in Brisbane, Australia. • Findings reveal how colonial land management continues to influence contemporary planning practice. • Urban restructuring, both colonial and contemporary, is facilitated by centralised control and a ‘blank slate’ for imprinting the planner's vision.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.