Spatial Decision Support for Determining Suitable Emergency Assembly Places Using GIS and MCDM Techniques

Abstract

Natural and man-made disasters threaten humans. Effective emergency management is essential to minimize disasters and their harmful effects. Prevention, preparation, response, and recovery are the basic phases of emergency management. Emergency assembly places are very important in emergency management during the preparation phase, as these are the first places to be reached during and after the disaster. This study aims to identify the most suitable locations for emergency assembly points, which play a critical role in sustainable disaster management. The location of emergency assembly points is influenced by many criteria. In this study, suitable locations for emergency places were investigated on the basis of criteria. The Best–Worst Method (BWM), a relatively new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method that requires fewer pairwise comparisons and yet provides consistent results, is used to calculate the weights of the criteria after comparing results with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The weighted criteria were then used to perform spatial analyses using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). In this study, a two-phase approach was used to determine suitable locations for assembly points: In the first phase, suitable areas were identified by applying raster-based analyses, and in the second phase, vector-based analyses were performed. The results of the two phases were evaluated together, and suitable locations for disaster assembly places were determined. In Atakum District, which is the study area, 41 emergency assembly places were identified, and suitable assembly places were ranked by the Preference Ranking Technique with Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. Results showed that the first three highest-ranked assembly points (AP) were AP20, AP15, and AP25, while the last three lowest-ranked assembly points were AP2, AP7, and AP6. The identification of these locations will provide crucial decision support for local governments, disaster management authorities, urban planners, etc. in ensuring a more sustainable city.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.