SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
COVID-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ : meta-research evaluation
11 references·0 citing·47 second hop
COVID-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ : meta-research evaluation (2025)COVID-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ : meta-…Prolific non-research authors in high impact scientific journals: meta-research study (2023)Prolific non-research authors…Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise during COVID-19 (2023)Political endorsement by Natu…Constructive and obsessive criticism in science (2022)Constructive and obsessive cr…Advocacy, activism, and lobbying: How variations in interpretation affects ability for academia to engage with public policy (2022)Advocacy, activism, and lobby…Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19 (2021)Optimizing Decision-Making Pr…A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior (2021)A survey of biomedical journa…Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators (2020)Updated science-wide author d…Difficult trade-offs in response to COVID-19: the case for open and inclusive decision making (2020)Difficult trade-offs in respo…Gender bias in Nobel prizes (2019)Gender bias in Nobel prizesCultural change in animals: a flexible behavioural adaptation to human disturbance (2019)Cultural change in animals: a…Communication of Science Advice to Government (2015)Communication of Science Advi…The Honest Broker (2007)The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics (2007)Policy: The art of science advice to government (2014)The possibilities of Open Science for knowledge transfer in the science-policy interface (2019)A Scientist’s Guide for Engaging in Policy in the United States (2020)Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia. (1996)Women in science: career processes and outcomes (2004)Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap (2013)Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work (2021)Gender, Race and Parenthood Impact Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Survey to Action (2021)Science’s greatest discoverers: a shift towards greater interdisciplinarity, top universities and older age (2024)Culture and the Evolutionary Process (1986)Cultures in chimpanzees (1999)Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture (2009)Innovation in chimpanzees (2020)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature (2021)Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite (2022)Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics (2023)Why Deliberative Democracy? (2004)Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation (2005)Democratic Innovations (2009)Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19 (2022)Citizen Knowledge (2023)Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review (2023)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams (1999)Chapter 2 Measurement of inequality (2000)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018)Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation (2022)Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science (2024)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)American Association of University Professors (2010)What meta‐research has taught us about research and changes to research practices (2024)When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions (2010)The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2018)Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020)Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda (2023)Drivers of health polarization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review (2025)Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication (2025)Science communication reconsidered (2009)Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices (2015)Features and signals in precocious citation impact: A meta-research study (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators237 cited
  • 2020Difficult trade-offs in response to COVID-19: the case for open and inclusive decision making117 cited
  • 2019Cultural change in animals: a flexible behavioural adaptation to human disturbance90 cited
  • 2021Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-1979 cited
  • 2021A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior74 cited
  • 2019Gender bias in Nobel prizes74 cited
  • 2015Communication of Science Advice to Government62 cited
  • 2023Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise during COVID-1952 cited
  • 2022Constructive and obsessive criticism in science26 cited
  • 2023Prolific non-research authors in high impact scientific journals: meta-research study21 cited
  • 2022Advocacy, activism, and lobbying: How variations in interpretation affects ability for academia to engage with public policy19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work