Why Platforms Become Scapegoats: Extending Attribution Theory in Multi-Actor Service Contexts

Abstract

Multi-actor exchange relationships involving platforms and individual service providers have become increasingly common in the online service sector. Drawing on attribution theory, this study identifies a phenomenon called the “locus-responsibility shift,” a form of scapegoating in which consumers transfer responsibility for service failures to a platform, even after recognizing the individual provider as the source of the problem. By uncovering this phenomenon, we challenge the traditional understanding of attribution and highlight the unique challenges platforms face in dealing with service failures. A text analysis of 24,183 consumer complaints and 4 experimental studies reveals that consumers on high (vs. low) intermediation platforms, those who experience severe (vs. mild) service failures, and those dealing with encounter (vs. core) service issues are more likely to attribute responsibility to the platform. These findings have important managerial implications for platform managers and offer guidance for developing effective platform strategies and service recovery practices to enhance customer satisfaction and safeguard platform’s reputation.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.