Why dignity is a troubling concept for AI ethics

Jon Rueda · Txetxu Ausín · Mark Coeckelbergh · Juan Ignacio del Valle · Belén Liedo · Joan Llorca Albareda +6 more

11 citations0/0 files storedPatterns

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Philosophical Ethics and Theory Literary and Philosophical Studies

Abstract

The concept of dignity is proliferating in ethical, legal, and policy discussions of AI, yet dignity is an elusive concept with multiple philosophical interpretations. The authors argue that the unspecific and uncritical employment of the notion of dignity can be counterproductive for AI ethics.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

2019The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines 2023Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance 2014Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people 2018Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity 2018What do we owe to intelligent robots?2020“Oh, Dignity too?” Said the Robot: Human Dignity as the Basis for the Governance of Robotics

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.