SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of Imaging Research Adherence to the STARD 2015 Reporting Guideline: Update 9 Years After Implementation and Baseline Assessment
16 references·0 citing·42 second hopsampled
Evaluation of Imaging Research Adherence to the STARD 2015 Reporting Guideline: Update 9 Years After Implementation and Baseline Assessment (2025)Evaluation of Imaging Research Adherence …Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? (2023)Has the quality of reporting …Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2020)Impact of a short version of …Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial (2020)Effect of an editorial interv…Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline (2018)Completeness of Reporting of …Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnost…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate? (2016)Is There an Association betwe…STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: An Updated List o…Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology (2015)Reporting Weaknesses in Confe…Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Literature survey of high-imp…Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates? (2015)Is Quality and Completeness o…Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy…Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD (2013)Reporting quality of diagnost…The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of diagnostic acc…Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2005)Quality of Reporting of Diagn…Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals (2000)Publications on diagnostic te…Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal (2017)Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021)The SPIRIT Checklist—lessons from the experience of SPIRIT protocol editors (2022)Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles (2023)Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,588 cited
  • 2015STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies1,353 cited
  • 2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
  • 2000Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals161 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies138 cited
  • 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD121 cited
  • 2014Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD113 cited
  • 2020Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial63 cited
  • 2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
  • 2015Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates?56 cited
  • 2018Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline37 cited
  • 2020Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial34 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies
29 cited
  • 2016Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate?19 cited
  • 2015Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology18 cited
  • 2023Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy?13 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.