Emerging trends in social entrepreneurship and sustainability: a Southeast Asia analysis

Abstract

Purpose This study conducted a comprehensive systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 442 scholarly articles published between 2001 and 2023, focusing on the intersection of social entrepreneurship and sustainability. By mapping the intellectual structure of the field, the study uncovered key research trajectories, influential contributions and emerging themes that shape the discourse. Design/methodology/approach The study used a systematic approach to reviewing the literature, used bibliometric techniques such as performance analysis, science mapping and content analysis to analyze the selected papers. Data from Scopus and Web of Science were analyzed using bibliometric tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny to visualize citation networks, thematic clusters and research collaborations. Findings The results suggested a significant increase in publications post-2016, indicating heightened scholarly interest and increasing contributions to the field. The study identified leading authors, core journals and dominant publishing countries, highlighting key insights from Southeast Asia. In addition, the findings highlighted the limited international collaboration, particularly in Southeast Asia, underscoring the need for stronger research networks and cross-border partnerships to advance knowledge in this critical area. Originality/value This study offers a novel and systematic evaluation of the research landscape in social entrepreneurship and sustainability, providing actionable insights for academics, policymakers and practitioners. By identifying current research trends and existing gaps, it contributes to shaping future research directions, with a particular emphasis on the evolving role of Southeast Asia in this domain. The findings serve as a foundation for supporting greater collaboration and advancing the theoretical and practical understanding of sustainable social entrepreneurship.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.