SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evolution of the methodological requirements for surgery-related publications
16 references·0 citing·46 second hopsampled
Evolution of the methodological requirements for surgery-related publications (2025)Evolution of the methodological requireme…The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies in surgery (2024)The STROCSS 2024 guideline: s…Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis (2024)Publishers’ and journals’ ins…Authorship and AI tools (2024)Authorship and AI toolsThe SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines (2023)The SCARE 2023 guideline: upd…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines (2020)The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: U…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: An Updated List o…Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Synthesizing information syst…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Methodological index for non‐…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review (2020)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines (2016)The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines (2018)The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines (2020)The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique (2023)CaReL Guidelines: A Consensus-Based Guideline on Case Reports and Literature Review (CaReL) (2024)Provenance and Funding of Extremely Cited Biomedical Articles Published Between 2003 and 2024 (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation45,728 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies22,003 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines16,035 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2003Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument7,658 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2023The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines3,171 cited
  • 2014Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews1,987 cited
  • 2015STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies1,353 cited
  • 2020The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

808 cited
  • 2024The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies in surgery362 cited
  • 2024Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis353 cited
  • 2024Authorship and AI tools105 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.