SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Revisiting the Role of Review Articles in the Age of AI-Agents: Integrating AI-Reasoning and AI-Synthesis Reshaping the Future of Scientific Publishing
7 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Revisiting the Role of Review Articles in the Age of AI-Agents: Integrating AI-Reasoning and AI-Synthesis Reshaping the Future of Scientific Publishing (2025)Revisiting the Role of Review Articles in…The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The strain on scientific publ…The global geography of artificial intelligence in life science research (2024)The global geography of artif…Is human oversight to AI systems still possible? (2024)Is human oversight to AI syst…Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)Artificial intelligence and i…Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence in sy…How to write a good scientific review article (2022)How to write a good scientifi…Citation Analysis and Trends in review articles in dentistry (2017)Citation Analysis and Trends …Leveraging open-source large language models (LLMs) in scoping reviews: a case study on disability and AI applications (2025)Leveraging open-source large …The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Are coronectomy studies being cited? A bibliometric study (2018)Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentistry (2019)A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Japanese Encephalitis From 1934 to 2020 (2022)The impact of review articles (2007)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data (2019)A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Scientific Review Article (2023)AI meets academia: transforming systematic literature reviews (2024)Pelatihan Penyusunan Artikel Ilmiah Bagi Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam (2024)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Here, There and Everywhere: On the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Management Research and the Peer‐Review Process (2024)Generative artificial intelligence use in evidence synthesis: A systematic review (2025)Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit (2025)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Situated Learning (1991)CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA (2012)REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science (2024)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions (2025)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The forced battle between peer-review and scientometric research assessment: Why the CoARA initiative is unsound (2024)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system (2025)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Global distribution of research efforts, disease burden, and impact of US public funding withdrawal (2025)Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science (2025)AI in science: When and where it makes a difference (2026)Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy (2020)The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms (2022)Can generative AI reliably synthesise literature? exploring hallucination issues in ChatGPT (2025)The Effect of Generative AI Ethics on Users’ Continuous Usage Intentions: A PLS-SEM and fsQCA Approach (2025)Beyond External Constraints: The Missing Dimension of AI Governance (2026)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2024Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research699 cited
  • 2024The strain on scientific publishing307 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used245 cited
  • 2024Is human oversight to AI systems still possible?136 cited
  • 2022How to write a good scientific review article45 cited
  • 2017Citation Analysis and Trends in review articles in dentistry43 cited
  • 2024The global geography of artificial intelligence in life science research31 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Leveraging open-source large language models (LLMs) in scoping reviews: a case study on disability and AI applications19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work