SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
AI-assisted evidence screening method for systematic reviews in environmental research: integrating ChatGPT with domain knowledge
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
AI-assisted evidence screening method for systematic reviews in environmental research: integrating ChatGPT with domain knowledge (2025)AI-assisted evidence screening method for…School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave (2022)School Closures During Social…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data (2019)A step by step guide for cond…ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)ROSES RepOrting standards for…Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics (2017)Eligibility screening in evid…A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)A methodology for systematic …Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research (2015)Systematic review approaches …ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…The Systematic Review (2014)The Systematic ReviewThe Elusive Pursuit of Interdisciplinarity at the Human--Environment Interface (2013)The Elusive Pursuit of Interd…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Measuring Agreement between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait (1975)Measuring Agreement between T…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain: A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions (2021)Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review (2021)MetaAnalysisOnline.com: Web-Based Tool for the Rapid Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Epidemiological Studies (2025)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2022)How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects (2022)Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2018ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps944 cited
  • 2019A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data813 cited
  • 2022School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave789 cited
  • 2016A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences766 cited
  • 2014The Systematic Review598 cited
  • 1975Measuring Agreement between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait501 cited
  • 2015Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research473 cited
  • 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews
214 cited
  • 2013The Elusive Pursuit of Interdisciplinarity at the Human--Environment Interface107 cited
  • 2017Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics95 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.