SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the coverage of PubMed, Embase, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar for automated single-database searches in living guideline evidence surveillance: a case study of the international polycystic ovary syndrome guidelines 2023
8 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Assessing the coverage of PubMed, Embase, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar for automated single-database searches in living guideline evidence surveillance: a case study of the international polycystic ovary syndrome guidelines 2023 (2025)Assessing the coverage of PubMed, Embase,…Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)Research Integrity in Guideli…The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform (2023)The Semantic Scholar Open Dat…Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases (2022)Search where you will find mo…Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency (2022)Most published systematic rev…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Waste in covid-19 researchRoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Analyzing the Utility of Openalex to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews: Methods and a Case Study (2025)Analyzing the Utility of Open…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review (2020)Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making (2021)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Extent and nature of duplication in PROSPERO using COVID-19-related registrations: a retrospective investigation and survey (2022)From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews (2023)The effect of machine learning tools for evidence synthesis on resource use and time-to-completion: protocol for a retrospective pilot study (2023)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)Resilience of small and medium-sized enterprises in times of crisis: an umbrella review (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices (2024)Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS statement (2024)Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems (2023)Content-based quality evaluation of scientific papers using coarse feature and knowledge entity network (2024)The OpenCitations Index: description of a database providing open citation data (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,149 cited
  • 2020Waste in covid-19 research330 cited
  • 2022Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases210 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review189 cited
  • 2023The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform63 cited
  • 2024Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis35 cited
  • 2022Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency24 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Analyzing the Utility of Openalex to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews: Methods and a Case Study7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work