Articlehybrid2025

Sustainability Strategy and Financial Performance in SMEs —On the Role of Sustainability Management Control Systems

14 citations0/0 files storedCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Accounting and Organizational Management Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Environmental Sustainability in Business

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the interplay among sustainability strategy, sustainability management control systems (SMCSs) and financial performance among small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs). The research focuses on two distinct SMCS aspects: interactive and diagnostic control systems. With data collected from 271 out of 5656 randomly selected Finnish SMEs in 2021, this research aimed to investigate how sustainability strategy affects financial performance and whether SMCSs can moderate the connection between a company's sustainability strategy and financial performance. The ordinary least‐squares analysis of the results shows that economic strategy positively affects financial performance, while environmental strategy negatively affects financial performance. No significant effect was detected between social strategy and financial performance. Furthermore, interactive control systems drive the connection between economic strategy and financial performance, while diagnostic control systems drive the relationship between environmental strategy and financial performance. By being somewhat contradictory to the current research, the findings provide novel insights into how financial performance is affected differently by various aspects of sustainability strategy. It is speculated that contradictions exist because SMEs lack resources, Finland is a developed country and the research focuses on short‐term effects. The findings also suggest that the moderating the influence of SMCS depends on the strategic sustainability aspect and the chosen SMCS method, indicating a need for further research. Similarly, it is speculated that the complexity and novelty of the strategic goal affect the usability of SMCS methods.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 1999Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business 2015ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies 2014The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance 2002Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability 2004Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.