Citation map · Study

Digital Tools to Support the Systematic Review Process: An Introduction

16 references·1 citing·48 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,141 cited
2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
2009Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data659 cited
2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
2015RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials316 cited
2021Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references251 cited
2020Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial206 cited
2015Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers184 cited
2018Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy157 cited
2020SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation157 cited
2018Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by