Volatility Models in Practice: Rough, Path‐Dependent, or Markovian?

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present an empirical study examining several claims related to option prices in rough volatility literature using SPX options data. Our results show that rough volatility models with the parameter are inconsistent with the global shape of SPX smiles. In particular, the at‐the‐money SPX skew is incompatible with the power‐law shape generated by these models, which increases too fast for short maturities and decays too slowly for longer maturities. For maturities between 1 week and 3 months, rough volatility models underperform one‐factor Markovian models with the same number of parameters. When extended to longer maturities, rough volatility models do not consistently outperform one‐factor Markovian models. Our study identifies a non‐rough path‐dependent model and a two‐factor Markovian model that outperform their rough counterparts in capturing SPX smiles between 1 week and 3 years, with only three to four parameters.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.