My New Colleague, ChatGPT? How German Science Journalists Perceive and Use (Generative) Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

If (generative) Artificial Intelligence ((gen)AI) has a major impact on the future of journalism, then the same holds true for science journalism, which is perceived to be in crisis. Drawing upon the Technology Acceptance Model and emphasising the evolving role of (gen)AI in the entire news production process, this paper considers perceived benefits (e.g., efficiency) and risks (e.g., accuracy) associated with (gen)AI integration into science journalistic practices. The study employs semi-structured interviews with 30 German science journalists, exploring their perceptions and use of (gen)AI in the selection, production, and distribution of news. It finds that AI is largely perceived as a colleague that can enhance efficiency, and genAI is not permitted to operate without human oversight. Based on interviews with German journalists in this study, (gen)AI will most likely not worsen the crisis of science journalism but may even improve working conditions.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.