SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Crafting cohesive narratives: a step-by-step innovative pattern for writing structured discussions in research
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Crafting cohesive narratives: a step-by-step innovative pattern for writing structured discussions in research (2025)Crafting cohesive narratives: a step-by-s…How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research (2024)How to combine and clean bibl…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)The art of writing literature…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Review articles: purpose, process, and structure (2017)Review articles: purpose, pro…bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)bibliometrix : An R-tool for …Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement (2015)Risk of Bias in Reports of In…How to Write a Literature Review Paper? (2015)How to Write a Literature Rev…A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage (2015)A Critical Review and Best‐Pr…Systematic Reviews (2014)Systematic ReviewsRobust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss (2013)Robust variance estimation wi…New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)New developments in the use o…Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfall…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…Human Capital. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (1965)Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation (1989)HELPING AND VOICE EXTRA-ROLE BEHAVIORS: EVIDENCE OF CONSTRUCT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY. (1998)Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach (2017)Surveying the forest: A meta‐analysis, moderator investigation, and future‐oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover (2017)Addressing Endogeneity in International Marketing Applications of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. (1995)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review (1989)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework (2020)Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Designing conceptual articles: four approaches (2020)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review16,627 cited
  • 2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis16,195 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines16,035 cited
  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines14,255 cited
  • 2020The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?2,952 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2015A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage1,744 cited
  • 2017Review articles: purpose, process, and structure1,004 cited
  • 2005Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities886 cited
  • 2015How to Write a Literature Review Paper?592 cited
  • 2013Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss588 cited
  • 2014Systematic Reviews536 cited
  • 2009New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation506 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research394 cited
  • 2015Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement358 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.