SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)Defining quality in peer review reports: …Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability (2024)Effects of an AI-supported ap…Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Can Large Language Models Pro…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Artificial intelligence in sy…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…AI-assisted peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer reviewThe limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research (2016)Reviewing the research method…Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion (2015)Innovations in the systematic…The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance (2008)The nature of feedback: how d…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Synthesising qualitative and …Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER (2003)HOW TO REVIEW A PAPERDevelopment of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)Development of the Review Qua…The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. (1988)The Power of Feedback (2007)Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work (2010)Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality (2016)Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies (2018)Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach (2014)Resilience and mental health nursing: An integrative review of international literature (2018)The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review (2021)The growing burden of workplace violence against healthcare workers: trends in prevalence, risk factors, consequences, and prevention – a narrative review (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance (2023)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2005Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods2,130 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,149 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2008The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance602 cited
  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • 2021AI-assisted peer review284 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2015Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion254 cited
  • 2024Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis253 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used245 cited
  • 1999Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts177 cited
  • 2024Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

173 cited
  • 2003HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER143 cited
  • 2016Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research128 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.