SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality in science communication with communicative artificial intelligence: A principle-based framework
16 references·0 citing·53 second hop
Quality in science communication with communicative artificial intelligence: A principle-based framework (2025)Quality in science communication with com…The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Explo…Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges (2023)Six Human-Centered Artificial…Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Fabrication and errors in the…Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI (2021)Sustainable AI: AI for sustai…Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models (2021)Ethical and social risks of h…Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough (2020)Microsoft Academic Graph: Whe…Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy (2020)Human-Centered Artificial Int…The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The global landscape of AI et…Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability (2019)Artificial Intelligence, Resp…Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda (2019)Artificial intelligence and c…AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)AI4People—An Ethical Framewor…AI can be sexist and racist — it’s time to make it fair (2018)AI can be sexist and racist —…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review (2005)Storylines of research in dif…In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism (2005)In Search of a Standard: four…Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy (1993)Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1997)Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (2000)On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders (2019)News media trust and its impact on media use: toward a framework for future research (2020)Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization (2020)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006)Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Fairness through awareness (2012)Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes (2018)Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities (2020)Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy AI (2022)Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework (2021)Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964)Mind, Self, and Society (1967)Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: learning from Covid-19 (2021)My AI Friend: How Users of a Social Chatbot Understand Their Human–AI Friendship (2022)Too human and not human enough: A grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika (2022)The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (2023)Ironies of automation (1983)A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation (2000)The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability (2003)Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice (2020)A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective (2022)The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and Associations with Personality, Corporate Distrust, and General Trust (2022)The Economics of Welfare (1933)Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification (2018)Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability (2021)Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2022)The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective (2022)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2019The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines6,172 cited
  • 2018AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations4,732 cited
  • 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy1,724 cited
  • 2019Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda965 cited
  • 2021Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI934 cited
  • 2005Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review912 cited
  • 2018AI can be sexist and racist — it’s time to make it fair764 cited
  • 2005In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism571 cited
  • 2020Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough513 cited
  • 2023Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges498 cited
  • 2023Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT489 cited
  • 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models477 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology
474 cited
  • 2019Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability471 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.