SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Errors, questionable practices, or misconduct? A bibliometric and altmetric review covering two decades of retractions in Latin America
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Errors, questionable practices, or misconduct? A bibliometric and altmetric review covering two decades of retractions in Latin America (2025)Errors, questionable practices, or miscon…More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)More than 10,000 research pap…Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)Misconduct as the main cause …Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Post retraction citations in …The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)The visibility of scientific …The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions (2014)Research Misconduct Definitio…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a…Responsible Conduct of Research (2009)Responsible Conduct of Resear…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Guidelines for retracting articles (2009)Guidelines for retracting art…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)The Continued Use of Retracte…The Force of Knowledge: The Scientific Dimension of Society (1977)The Force of Knowledge: The S…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures (2009)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Scientific Utopia (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? (2018)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Temporal characteristics of retracted articles (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Price of Truth (2007)Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future (2011)Ethics in Qualitative Research: A View of the Participants' and Researchers' World from a Critical Standpoint (2012)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping24,911 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2,343 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data2,022 cited
  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,741 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,282 cited
  • 2009Responsible Conduct of Research428 cited
  • 2023More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record375 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature362 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
  • 1990The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature188 cited
  • 2009Guidelines for retracting articles185 cited
  • 2016The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles153 cited
  • 1977The Force of Knowledge: The Scientific Dimension of Society149 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors
140 cited
  • 2014Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions123 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.