SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Prompting the Machine: Introducing an LLM Data Extraction Method for Social Scientists
9 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Prompting the Machine: Introducing an LLM Data Extraction Method for Social Scientists (2025)Prompting the Machine: Introducing an LLM…Keeping Humans in the Loop: Human-Centered Automated Annotation with Generative AI (2025)Keeping Humans in the Loop: H…The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation (2023)The political ideology of con…The Political Biases of ChatGPT (2023)The Political Biases of ChatG…Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples (2023)Out of One, Many: Using Langu…More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias (2023)More human than human: measur…ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks (2023)ChatGPT outperforms crowd wor…Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science? (2023)Can Large Language Models Tra…Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Aion Framework: Dimensional E…Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases (2021)Detecting Emergent Intersecti…Distributional Structure (1954)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. (1998)Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. (2003)Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biases (2021)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024)Affect, Not Ideology (2012)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2017)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)The Media Frames Corpus: Annotations of Frames Across Issues (2015)Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data (2016)Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena (2023)Can Generative AI improve social science? (2024)A Measure of Media Bias (2005)Media Bias and Reputation (2006)Perils and opportunities in using large language models in psychological research (2024)Harnessing the power of AI in qualitative research: Exploring, using and redesigning ChatGPT (2025)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm (1993)RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (2019)Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI (2024)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)Measurement and Fairness (2021)Just Put a Human in the Loop? Investigating LLM-Assisted Annotation for Subjective Tasks (2025)Human-in-the-Loop Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Methods, and Applications (2026)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? (2023)The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies (2023)Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science (2025)Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings (2023)Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models (2024)The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics13,695 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks1,338 cited
  • 2023Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples817 cited
  • 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?676 cited
  • 2023More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias352 cited
  • 2023The Political Biases of ChatGPT273 cited
  • 2021Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases179 cited
  • 2023The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation172 cited
  • 2025Keeping Humans in the Loop: Human-Centered Automated Annotation with Generative AI49 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work