SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Clothing Brands’ Sustainability Practices: A Bibliometric Approach
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Clothing Brands’ Sustainability Practices: A Bibliometric Approach (2025)Clothing Brands’ Sustainability Practices…How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research (2024)How to combine and clean bibl…Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries (2023)Sustainability trends and gap…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Conducting systematic literat…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains (2016)Foundations and trends in per…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Organizational Transparency (2014)Organizational TransparencyPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Comparing alternatives to the…Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure (1981)Author cocitation: A literatu…Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Bibliographic coupling betwee…Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review (2022)How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal (2024)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (2010)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines14,255 cited
  • 1963Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers2,873 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,085 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2019Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses1,656 cited
  • 1981Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure1,221 cited
  • 2014Organizational Transparency936 cited
  • 2007Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature714 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases686 cited
  • 2024How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

394 cited
  • 2016Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains365 cited
  • 2023Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries283 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.