Extracting toponyms from OpenStreetMap and other gazetteers: comparing representational accuracy in multilingual contexts

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to investigate OpenStreetMap as a research tool by analysing what pros and cons this platform offers to linguistics and to GIS disciplines. To reach this goal, the paper analyses how this platform represents places as geographical units and toponyms (i.e. place names) as linguistic units referring to places. The paper presents two previous studies that featured a novel procedure for toponym extraction and its application to OpenStreetMap toponym data. These two studies focused on distinct scales and densities of geographical distribution in multi-lingual contexts: city level (Macao); mixed regional and national level (Italy). The studies also included a comparison of these data with data originating from an authoritative geographic source (e.g. Italian street directories). The present paper extends the analysis and results from these studies by showing that via a single extraction algorithm, one can obtain all the relevant toponyms from overpass-turbo, a platform including OpenStreetMap’s textual information, and from other gazetteers. For each level of analysis, the paper shows that toponyms come in different combinations of multi-lingual formats: Chinese and Portuguese for Macao, Italian, local dialects (e.g. Genoese), and minority languages (e.g. German) for Italy. From these data, the paper offers an analysis of language-specific features, methodological challenges, and informational accuracy of each database. The paper proposes that OpenStreetMap may be as reliable as authoritative sources; however, one must apply cross-source comparison during data analysis, to confirm OpenStreetMap-based data. The paper concludes by discussing the current role of OpenStreetMap as an information database in toponym extraction. The paper discusses the use of OSM in linguistics and GIS disciplines, and how these uses can offer theoretical insights informing research in these disciplines.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.