SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes of science shows: a systematic review
9 references·0 citing·43 second hop
The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes of science shows: a systematic review (2025)The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcom…The Christmas Lectures: extending the experience outside the lecture theatre (2022)The Christmas Lectures: exten…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Evaluation of Science Communication: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Implications (2021)Evaluation of Science Communi…Evaluating the short-term and long-term impact of an interactive science show (2021)Evaluating the short-term and…How are we performing? Evidence for the value of science shows (2018)How are we performing? Eviden…Engagement with physics across diverse festival audiences (2016)Engagement with physics acros…Science on the stage (2002)Science on the stageScience for All, Including Students From Non-English-Language Backgrounds (1998)Science for All, Including St…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change (1982)Ways with Words (1983)National Science Education Standards (1995)Chapter 1 Developing Socially Just Subject-Matter Instruction: A Review of the Literature on Disciplinary Literacy Teaching (2007)Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space (2008)Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction (2010)Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (1985)Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. (2000)The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior (2000)Motivation factors and barriers to the continuous use of blended learning approach using Moodle: students' perceptions and individual differences (2019)“It Was Just Amazing!” Unstructured Interactions Following a Planetarium and Science Shows (2025)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools (1991)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Public perceptions of European research: an evaluation of European Researchers’ Night in Ireland (2017)Bright Club: Establishing a Science Comedy Variety Night in Ireland (2019)The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication (2014)Why should we promote public engagement with science? (2014)The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (2017)Building Blocks of Virtuous Science Communication: Grant Funding, Policy Making, and Public Engagement (2021)Evaluationsmethoden der Wissenschaftskommunikation (2023)Minoritized Scientists in the United States: An Identity Perspective to Science Communication (2023)Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment (1996)Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom (2001)States of Curiosity Modulate Hippocampus-Dependent Learning via the Dopaminergic Circuit (2014)Impact of a large-scale interactive and immersive science pop-up shop about infection and hygiene on visitors and volunteers (2026)Social Research Methods (2003)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Participatory science communication for transformation (2022)Popular Theatre for Science Engagement: Audience Engagement with Human Cloning Following a Production of Caryl Churchill'sA Number (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 1998Science for All, Including Students From Non-English-Language Backgrounds477 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of Science Communication: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Implications50 cited
  • 2018How are we performing? Evidence for the value of science shows22 cited
  • 2002Science on the stage13 cited
  • 2016Engagement with physics across diverse festival audiences12 cited
  • 2021Evaluating the short-term and long-term impact of an interactive science show10 cited
  • 2022The Christmas Lectures: extending the experience outside the lecture theatre6 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work