SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of digital therapeutics in decentralized clinical trials: A scoping review
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Assessment of digital therapeutics in decentralized clinical trials: A scoping review (2025)Assessment of digital therapeutics in dec…Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research (2022)Reducing systematic review bu…A framework for digital health equity (2022)A framework for digital healt…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review (2021)Barriers and facilitators to …The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Role of digital therapeutics and the changing future of healthcare (2020)Role of digital therapeutics …Effectiveness of a Mobile App Intervention for Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial (2020)Effectiveness of a Mobile App…Guided Self-Help Works: Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial of Pacifica, a Mobile App Integrating Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Mindfulness for Stress, Anxiety, and Depression (2019)Guided Self-Help Works: Rando…Using Mobile Apps to Assess and Treat Depression in Hispanic and Latino Populations: Fully Remote Randomized Clinical Trial (2018)Using Mobile Apps to Assess a…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement (2018)Adoption of Mobile Apps for D…The Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Depression: Results From a Fully Remote Clinical Trial (2016)The Use and Effectiveness of …Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Conducting a fully mobile and randomised clinical trial for depression: access, engagement and expense (2016)Conducting a fully mobile and…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder (2006)Smartphones for Smarter Delivery of Mental Health Programs: A Systematic Review (2013)Insights from user reviews to improve mental health apps (2020)The Economic Burden of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018) (2021)The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality (2025)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Scoping Review (2023)Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review (2024)Factors influencing digital health literacy among older adults: a scoping review (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. (1982)Digital divide as a determinant of health in the U.S. older adults: prevalence, trends, and risk factors (2024)Navigating the digital world: development of an evidence-based digital literacy program and assessment tool for youth (2024)Recommendations to advance digital health equity: a systematic review of qualitative studies (2024)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Human-Centered Design of Mobile Health Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis (2021)Assessing Patient Adherence to and Engagement With Digital Interventions for Depression in Clinical Trials: Systematic Literature Review (2023)Digital therapeutics from bench to bedside (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews5,174 cited
  • 2021Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review703 cited
  • 2022A framework for digital health equity600 cited
  • 2016The Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Depression: Results From a Fully Remote Clinical Trial375 cited
  • 2020Role of digital therapeutics and the changing future of healthcare251 cited
  • 2018Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement183 cited
  • 2016Conducting a fully mobile and randomised clinical trial for depression: access, engagement and expense172 cited
  • 2019Guided Self-Help Works: Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial of Pacifica, a Mobile App Integrating Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Mindfulness for Stress, Anxiety, and Depression157 cited
  • 2018Using Mobile Apps to Assess and Treat Depression in Hispanic and Latino Populations: Fully Remote Randomized Clinical Trial

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

120 cited
  • 2020Effectiveness of a Mobile App Intervention for Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial120 cited
  • 2022Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research115 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.