SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Optimal large language models to screen citations for systematic reviews
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Optimal large language models to screen citations for systematic reviews (2025)Optimal large language models to screen c…Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)Title and abstract screening …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Automated Paper Screening for…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Software tools to support tit…Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? (2019)A question of trust: can we b…Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approach (2018)Using systematic reviews in g…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence (2013)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)Formulating research questions for evidence-based studies (2023)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews (2021)Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,564 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,149 cited
  • 2023Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy755 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis635 cited
  • 2020Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation448 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews351 cited
  • 2018Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approach259 cited
  • 2020Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews214 cited
  • 2023Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

205 cited
  • 2019A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?167 cited
  • 2024Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain150 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.