SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the potential risks of employing large language models in peer review
8 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Evaluating the potential risks of employing large language models in peer review (2025)Evaluating the potential risks of employi…Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Can Large Language Models Pro…Is ChatGPT a “Fire of Prometheus” for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing? (2023)Is ChatGPT a “Fire of Prometh…ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review (2023)ChatGPT identifies gender dis…ChatGPT and the Future of Journal Reviews: A Feasibility Study (2023)ChatGPT and the Future of Jou…Affiliation Bias in Peer Review of Abstracts by a Large Language Model (2023)Affiliation Bias in Peer Revi…How to write a thorough peer review (2018)How to write a thorough peer …Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study (2014)Potentially coercive self-cit…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research? (2017)Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention (2019)The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? (2005)Bias in peer review (2012)Intraclass correlation – A discussion and demonstration of basic features (2019)Use of ChatGPT to Explore Gender and Geographic Disparities in Scientific Peer Review (2024)Evaluation of Large Language Models for Peer Review in Transplantation Research: Algorithm Validation Study (2026)The American Association for the Advancement of Science (1889)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence (2023)Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI (2024)Advanced multi-lingual writers’ self-directed use of generative AI in academic writing: Rethinking writing, authorship, and learning (2025)Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing (2025)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers (2025)Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey (2025)Peer Review in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Call for Developing Responsible Integration Guidelines (2025)Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance (2006)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)Establishing best practices in large language model research: an application to repeat prompting (2024)Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities (2025)Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Art and the science of generative AI (2023)ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills (2024)The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback (2024)Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers (2025)Supportive peer review: Why and how to constructively review a paper (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • 2024Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis253 cited
  • 2023Is ChatGPT a “Fire of Prometheus” for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?107 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT and the Future of Journal Reviews: A Feasibility Study65 cited
  • 2014Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study65 cited
  • 2023Affiliation Bias in Peer Review of Abstracts by a Large Language Model27 cited
  • 2018How to write a thorough peer review18 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review16 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work