Using Indonesian corruption law for eradicating the Yogyakarta Sultanate Land Mafia: a legal formulation study

Abstract

This study aims to examine the problematic functionalization of corruption offenses inside the Sultan Grond and Paku Alaman Grond land mafia and propose strategies for eliminating the Sultan Grond and Paku Alaman Grond land mafia by implementing corruption offenses in the future. The present study adopts a normative legal research methodology, incorporating both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach that deviates from the actual occurrence of land grabbing in Sultan Grond and Paku Alaman Grond. The results of the research show that based on the research findings and legal investigations, it can be concluded that: a. the prospect of functionalizing the provisions of the crime of corruption in the eradication of the "Sultan Grond and Paku Alaman Grond" land mafia case in Yogyakarta has a weakness because in the legal regime of state finances the "Sultan Grond and Paku Alaman Grond" asset is not one of the state assets, in other words, the foundation for the use of corruption offenses in the land mafia still does not have a solid juridical basis so that several things need to be done, one of which is to include the "sultan grond" asset as one of the protected sub in the corruption offense in the legal politics of eradicating corruption offenses; b. The regulation of eradicating the land mafia through the crime of corruption There are two potential approaches to address the issue of land mafia through corruption offenses in the case of " Sultan Grond and Paku Alaman Grond" The first approach involves incorporating the provisions of sultan ground land as a component of state assets, separate from the broader state property law. This classification of sultan ground land as special assets is supported by the DIY privileges outlined in Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution and the KDIY Law. The second approach entails recognizing special regional assets as protected components of the Corruption Eradication Law.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.