Reviewdiamond2025

The Intersection of Green AI, Digital Advertising, and Corporate Sustainability: A Systematic Review

Ogechukwu T. Ibeama · Rebecca Oluwakemi Alabi · Lydia A. Dampare Addo · Levi Ijebor · Arinze E. Anaege

5 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Journal of Economics and Business Innovation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business Digital Marketing and Social Media Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability

Abstract

The growing intersection of digital advertising, corporate sustainability, and artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how organizations engage with consumers and communicate their environmental and social commitments. This study conducts a PRISMA-guided systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2015 and 2025, with the objective of understanding how AI, particularly sustainable or “Green AI”, is influencing digital advertising strategies aligned with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. A total of 19 articles were included based on clear inclusion criteria: English-language, peer-reviewed empirical or conceptual studies addressing AI, sustainability, and digital advertising. Articles were excluded if they lacked relevance to the intersection of these domains or did not meet minimum methodological standards. Five key themes emerged: AI’s transformative role in green marketing, the integration of sustainability into advertising strategy, risks such as greenwashing and ethical concerns, personalization’s influence on consumer trust and behavior, and the theoretical frameworks shaping the field. While AI enhances targeting and sustainability messaging, it also introduces challenges, such as energy consumption, ethical trade-offs, and strategic misalignment. Drawing on Stakeholder Theory and the Triple Bottom Line, this review provides a structured lens for understanding these tensions. Limitations include the novelty of the topic, limited geographic diversity, and a concentration of studies in consumer-facing sectors. Practical implications include the need for firms to align AI use with authentic sustainability commitments and for policymakers to strengthen digital ESG accountability frameworks.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews 2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement 2020Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories 2017“Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature 2023Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria: their impacts on corporate sustainability performance 2024Revisiting knowledge on ESG/CSR and financial performance: A bibliometric and systematic review of moderating variables 2023Promoting Responsible Sustainable Consumer Behavior through Sustainability Marketing: The Boundary Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Image

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.