We study how the separation of time and risk preferences relates to a property called stochastic impatience. We show that, within a broad class of models, stochastic impatience holds if and only if risk aversion and the inverse elasticity of intertemporal substitution are sufficiently close. In the models of Epstein and Zin (1989) and Hansen and Sargent (1995), stochastic impatience is violated for all commonly used parameters. Our result also provides a simple, one‐question test for the separation of time and risk preferences.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.