The future of reviews

Alexander S. Hauser

8 citations0/0 files storedEMBO Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

The rise of Large Language Models allows generating summaries of and analyzing the scientific literature at unprecedented speed. The academic community must acknowledge and prepare for a pivotal shift: as AI tools continue to improve, traditional literature reviews may no longer be the default approach to synthesizing research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses 2022Review Research as Scientific Inquiry 2022Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review 2016Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize 2021Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation 2022Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals 2025Human versus artificial intelligence: evaluating ChatGPT’s performance in conducting published systematic reviews with meta-analysis in chronic pain research 2024Can AI review the scientific literature — and figure out what it all means?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.