SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality Appraisal Tools for Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Studies: A Review and a Brief New Checklist
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Quality Appraisal Tools for Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Studies: A Review and a Brief New Checklist (2025)Quality Appraisal Tools for Quantitative,…Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis (2020)Optimising the value of the c…Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Improving the content validit…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)The Mixed Methods Appraisal T…Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Journal article reporting sta…Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT ) (2018)Improving the usefulness of a…Thematic Analysis (2017)Thematic AnalysisThe development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence (2014)The development of a critical…An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)An Introduction to Systematic…Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications (2012)Interrater agreement and inte…Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool (2011)Reviewing studies with divers…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for…Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research (2007)Justifying Knowledge, Justify…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis (1995)Best evidence synthesis: An i…Scale Development: Theory and Applications. (1992)Scale Development: Theory and…The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)A Qualitative Study (2009)Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports (2014)The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry (2016)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131 (2020)Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews (2021)A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research (2023)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. (2017)The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases (2019)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series (2018)Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Scale Development Research (2006)Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale (2010)Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2017Thematic Analysis13,981 cited
  • 2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement12,147 cited
  • 2018The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers4,688 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 1992Scale Development: Theory and Applications.3,634 cited
  • 2014The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence1,475 cited
  • 2018Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.1,446 cited
  • 2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews1,235 cited
  • 2007Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research1,142 cited
  • 2020Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis1,108 cited
  • 2018Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT )1,080 cited
  • 2019Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study1,078 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1995Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis950 cited
  • 2012Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications921 cited
  • 2011Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool714 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.