The Effects of Reference Dependence on Judicial Persuasion

Abstract

ABSTRACT I study a model of persuasion in which a loss‐averse judge has reference‐dependent preferences. When the loss from wrongful conviction looms largest, the outcome that forms the judge's reference point has significant implications for the effectiveness of persuasion. When acquitting the innocent or the guilty is the reference point, an increase in the judge's loss aversion decreases the prosecutor's gain from persuasion. On the other hand, when convicting the guilty is the reference point, this gain increases as the judge becomes more loss‐averse. With a reference‐dependent jury, the interplay between the reference point and the complementarity of the jurors' actions offers a novel theoretical explanation for the differing behavior of judges and juries.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.