SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A tailored fit that doesn’t fit all: the problem of threshold overfitting in diagnostic studies
3 references·0 citing·15 second hop
A tailored fit that doesn’t fit all: the problem of threshold overfitting in diagnostic studies (2025)A tailored fit that doesn’t fit all: the …Assessing risk of bias and applicability (2023)Assessing risk of bias and ap…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)How Do “Ugly Science” and “Dirty Science” Affect the Practice of Clinical Science? (2025)QUADAS-3 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,588 cited
  • 2023Assessing risk of bias and applicability47 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work