SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the properties of the fragility index of meta-analyses
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Evaluating the properties of the fragility index of meta-analyses (2025)Evaluating the properties of the fragilit…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Analysing data and undertakin…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Redefine statistical significance (2017)Redefine statistical signific…Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 …Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis (2015)Methods to estimate the betwe…The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkm…Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Interpretation of random effe…A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Eff…Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Assessing heterogeneity in me…Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model (2005)Bias and Efficiency of Meta-A…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)The Combination of Estimates …Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Costs, Risks, and Benefits of Surgery. (1978)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)The analysis of groups of experiments (1938)Variance of a Weighted Mean (1953)Design and Analysis of Experiments (2007)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,995 cited
  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,808 cited
  • 1954The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments5,374 cited
  • 2006Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?4,245 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 2011Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses2,883 cited
  • 2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
  • 2019Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses2,679 cited
  • 2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,566 cited
  • 2014The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method2,504 cited
  • 2017Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity1,851 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,714 cited
  • 2005Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,696 cited
  • 2015Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis1,695 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.