No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The aim of this theoretical paper is to discuss the contemporary lines of criticism towards behavioural economics (BE) and propose ways in which BE can improve the predictive power and descriptive realism of economic models of human behaviour and financial markets at the aggregated level. BE was initially aimed to transform the paradigm of neoclassical economics, based predominantly on normative as if assumptions to a more realistic psychological background. However, at present BE is neither a real combination of economics and psychology nor a new distinctive economic paradigm. Moving beyond ‘as if’ BE requires adopting new data analysis methods from complexity theory and narrative economics. This shift would provide a more accurate, data-driven understanding of human economic decision-making in an increasingly complex world and how it may shape the economy at the aggregated level.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.