No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This article addresses the two-fold question of why accountability systems fail and how they can be fixed in public service delivery through the novel lens of policy design. More specifically, it scrutinizes the much-overlooked means-ends mismatch of the design of accountability policies and explores how a policy mix approach can solve this mismatch problem. Informed by carefully selected empirical examples, it illustrates how nodality-, authority-, treasure- and organization-based accountability tools need to be deployed differently to fulfill the ends that they are deemed most appropriate for, and how this systemic package can benefit from a finetuned distinction between primary and secondary tools alongside substantive and procedural tools. As a first attempt to connect the literature on accountability and that on policy design, the article demonstrates the theoretical value and practical relevance of a much-needed “bird view” of the “forest” of accountability beyond the usual scrutiny of its “trees” and “branches.”
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.